![]() However, we might reconsider going shopping at a more distant destination over somewhere closer until fuel costs drop and friction of distance decreases.Ī migrant who does not plan to return to their place of origin may consider the overall attractiveness of several destinations balanced against the relative costs of getting there. We might decide to carpool or take public transportation if it is available. We still have to go to work and back we might eventually choose to work somewhere closer if the friction of distance continues to grow. Suppose a variable such as fuel cost rises, then we would say that the friction of distance increases. These costs are all commonsense as we highlighted in the introduction, we choose where we go based on specific variables. People tend to be bound by the friction of distance because of a wide range of costs imposed by traveling from point A (origin) to point B (destination) and, usually, back. If they are twice as far from each other, they exert one-quarter of the attraction, etc. The law states that as distance increases, the effect of two things on each other decreases as the inverse of the square of the distance. Many equations describing spatial activities in the quantitative social sciences (e.g., in economics, and spatial analysis in geography) are derived from it. ![]() The friction of distance is derived from the inverse square law, rooted in physics. Everything is related to everything else, but near things are more related than distant things. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |